Clover, Carol. Scaldic Sensibility: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* '''Author''': | * '''Author''': Clover, Carol | ||
* '''Title''': | * '''Title''': "Scaldic sensibility." | ||
* '''Published in''': | * '''Published in''': ''Arkiv för nordisk filologi'' 93 | ||
* '''Place, Publisher''': | * '''Place, Publisher''': n/a | ||
* '''Year''': | * '''Year''': 1978 | ||
* '''Pages''': | * '''Pages''': 63-81 | ||
* '''E-text''': | * '''E-text''': | ||
* '''Reference''': '' | * '''Reference''': Clover, Carol. "Scaldic sensibility." ''Arkiv för nordisk filologi'' 93 (1978): 63-81. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* '''Key words''': | * '''Key words''': poetry (kveðskapur) | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Breyta - Skrá ítarefni | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Lykilorð: | |||
kveðskapur | |||
Sonatorrek | |||
Höfuðlausn | |||
Arinbjarnarkviða | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
Lykilorð á ensku: | |||
poetry | |||
Arinbjarnarkviða | |||
Höfuðlausn | |||
Sonatorrek | |||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
“Of this poem and others like it in the skaldic corpus it may be said that there are in fact two “topics,” an ostensible one, and the poet’s own perception of the ostensible one, and that the latter may on occasion so overshadow the former that it tends to become the poem’s main subject” (p. 65). | |||
[The first ten stanzas of Arinbjarnarkviða] “are in fact once again not at all about the ostensible topic, but about Egill’s own bravura Höfuðlausn performance” (p. 66). | |||
==Annotation== | ==Annotation== | ||
Shows that skaldic poetry, in contrast with eddic poetry, refers to the composer overtly and treats its subject matter very subjectively. Examples include Sonatorrek, in which the poet’s perception is more prominent than the topic itself, and Arinbjarnarkviða, which is really a chance for the poet to boast (about his Höfuðlausn performance) rather than discuss Arinbjörn. Clover proposes that this reflects the elevated social status of skaldic poets and poetry at the time. | |||
==Lýsing== | ==Lýsing== | ||
Clover sýnir fram á að í dróttkvæðum, ólíkt því sem á við um eddukvæði, er oft greinilega vísað til einstaklingsins sem semur kvæðið, auk þess sem fjallað er á mjög persónulegan hátt um viðfangsefnið. Hún tekur m.a. dæmi úr Sonatorreki, þar sem skynjun skáldsins skiptir meira máli en efni kvæðisins, og úr Arinbjarnarkviðu, þar sem skáldið leggur meira upp úr því að monta sig (af flutningi Höfuðlausnar í Jórvík) en að fjalla um Arinbjörn. Clover telur að þetta sé til marks um það hve skáldið og skáldskapur þess voru mikils metin í samfélaginu á sínum tíma. | |||
| Line 23: | Line 62: | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
* ''Written by:'' | * ''Written by:'' Jane Appleton | ||
* ''Icelandic | * ''Icelandic translation:'' Jón Karl Helgason | ||
[[Category:Egils saga]][[Category:Egils saga:_Articles]][[Category:Authors]][[Category:All entries]] | [[Category:Egils saga]][[Category:Egils saga:_Articles]][[Category:Authors]][[Category:Poetry]] | ||
[[Category:All entries]] | |||
Revision as of 14:27, 29 December 2011
- Author: Clover, Carol
- Title: "Scaldic sensibility."
- Published in: Arkiv för nordisk filologi 93
- Place, Publisher: n/a
- Year: 1978
- Pages: 63-81
- E-text:
- Reference: Clover, Carol. "Scaldic sensibility." Arkiv för nordisk filologi 93 (1978): 63-81.
- Key words: poetry (kveðskapur)
Breyta - Skrá ítarefni
Lykilorð: kveðskapur Sonatorrek Höfuðlausn Arinbjarnarkviða
Lykilorð á ensku: poetry Arinbjarnarkviða Höfuðlausn Sonatorrek
“Of this poem and others like it in the skaldic corpus it may be said that there are in fact two “topics,” an ostensible one, and the poet’s own perception of the ostensible one, and that the latter may on occasion so overshadow the former that it tends to become the poem’s main subject” (p. 65).
[The first ten stanzas of Arinbjarnarkviða] “are in fact once again not at all about the ostensible topic, but about Egill’s own bravura Höfuðlausn performance” (p. 66).
Annotation
Shows that skaldic poetry, in contrast with eddic poetry, refers to the composer overtly and treats its subject matter very subjectively. Examples include Sonatorrek, in which the poet’s perception is more prominent than the topic itself, and Arinbjarnarkviða, which is really a chance for the poet to boast (about his Höfuðlausn performance) rather than discuss Arinbjörn. Clover proposes that this reflects the elevated social status of skaldic poets and poetry at the time.
Lýsing
Clover sýnir fram á að í dróttkvæðum, ólíkt því sem á við um eddukvæði, er oft greinilega vísað til einstaklingsins sem semur kvæðið, auk þess sem fjallað er á mjög persónulegan hátt um viðfangsefnið. Hún tekur m.a. dæmi úr Sonatorreki, þar sem skynjun skáldsins skiptir meira máli en efni kvæðisins, og úr Arinbjarnarkviðu, þar sem skáldið leggur meira upp úr því að monta sig (af flutningi Höfuðlausnar í Jórvík) en að fjalla um Arinbjörn. Clover telur að þetta sé til marks um það hve skáldið og skáldskapur þess voru mikils metin í samfélaginu á sínum tíma.
See also
References
Links
- Written by: Jane Appleton
- Icelandic translation: Jón Karl Helgason
