Miller, William Ian. Justifying Skarpheðinn

From WikiSaga
Revision as of 08:10, 19 January 2016 by Beth Rogers (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • Author: Miller, William Ian
  • Title: Justifying Skarpheðinn: Of Pretext and Politics in the Icelandic Bloodfeud
  • Place, Publisher: Champaign, Illinois, University of Illinois Press
  • Year: 1983
  • Pages: 316-344
  • E-text:
  • Reference: Miller, William Ian. "Justifying Skarpheðinn: Of Pretext and Politics in the Icelandic Bloodfeud." Scandinavian Studies 55 (1983): 316-44.

  • Key words:

Annotation

In this article, Millier refutes the idea that that Skarpheiðinn´s killing of Höskuldr in the narrative was a bloodthirsty act of senseless violence, unilaterally condemned by society, or that it was the result of Skarpheiðinn being tricked by Mörðr into committing such an act. Instead, Miller argues that the killing of Höskuldr was politically motivated and consistent with the dynamic of the feud as it is depicted within the saga. He also argues that in Njáls saga, both parties manipulate the social rules which determine liability within feud structure to justify their violence as rightful retribution.

Lýsing

See also

References

Chapter 43: Hvar skál þá komit : "When Skarpheðinn hears of Þórðr´s death he is no longer amused" (p. 321).

Chapter 98: er nú til at ráða, ef þér vilið: "From Bergþóra´s egging of her sons to avenge their brother we get a small but sure hint that Höskuldr´s power has very much to do with their brother´s death" (p. 337)

Links

  • Written by: Beth Rogers
  • Icelandic/English translation: