Särndal, Carl-Erik. On Deciding Cases of Disputed Authorship: Difference between revisions

From WikiSaga
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


==Annotation==  
==Annotation==  
Särndal compares the approach of Mosteller and Wallace in their 1964 study of the authorship of the Federalist Papers to that employed in three Swedish cases where the author of a text or texts is disputed, including a study by Hallberg (1962) of the authorship of Egils saga. The Swedish studies differ from that of Mosteller and Wallace in that they focus on rare words rather than common ones; they also "tend to form their opinion as to what constitutes a discriminating word by a comparison in which the disputed text itself takes part" (p. 256).
==Lýsing==
==Lýsing==


Line 17: Line 20:
==See also==
==See also==


* [[Hallberg, Peter. Snorri Sturluson och Egils Saga Skallagrímssonar: ett försök till språklig författarbestämning]]


==References==  
==References==  
Line 22: Line 26:
==Links==
==Links==


* ''Written by:''
* ''Written by:'' Katelin Parsons
* ''Icelandic/English translation:''  
* ''Icelandic/English translation:''  


[[Category:Egils saga]][[Category:Egils saga:_Articles]][[Category:Authors]][[Category:All entries]]
[[Category:Egils saga]][[Category:Egils saga:_Articles]][[Category:Authors]][[Category:All entries]]

Revision as of 23:12, 5 March 2012

  • Author: Särndal, Carl-Erik
  • Title: On Deciding Cases of Disputed Authorship
  • Published in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 16/3
  • Year: 1967
  • Pages: 251-68
  • E-text:
  • Reference: Särndal, Carl-Erik. "On Deciding Cases of Disputed Authorship." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) 16/3 (1967): 251-68.

  • Key words:


Annotation

Särndal compares the approach of Mosteller and Wallace in their 1964 study of the authorship of the Federalist Papers to that employed in three Swedish cases where the author of a text or texts is disputed, including a study by Hallberg (1962) of the authorship of Egils saga. The Swedish studies differ from that of Mosteller and Wallace in that they focus on rare words rather than common ones; they also "tend to form their opinion as to what constitutes a discriminating word by a comparison in which the disputed text itself takes part" (p. 256).

Lýsing

See also

References

Links

  • Written by: Katelin Parsons
  • Icelandic/English translation: