Miller, William Ian. Bergthora vs. Hallgerd, Part I. The Theory: Chapters 35–45

From WikiSaga
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • Author: Miller, William Ian
  • Title: Bergthora vs. Hallgerd, Part I. The Theory: Chapters 35–45
  • Published in: Why Is Your Axe Bloody?: A Reading of Njáls Saga
  • Place, Publisher: New York: Oxford University Press
  • Year: 2014
  • Pages: 73-87
  • E-text:
  • Reference: Miller, William Ian. Why Is Your Axe Bloody?: A Reading of Njáls Saga. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

  • Key words:

Annotation

In this chapter Miller examines the logic behind the killings initiated by Hallgerðr and Bergþóra, offering his balanced-exchange model, which he initially introduced in Bloodtaking and Peacemaking. He argues that the feud process was meant to achieve balance between both sides, and that payment for an injury could be done through money and through blood, but the latter was a more trustworthy form of ‘currency’. Miller argues that the balance-exchange model was hardly perfect and criticized by the author of Njáls saga, since ‘getting even’ usually implies overcoming your enemies rather than achieving a true balance with them. Miller also looks at the killing of Sigmundr by Skarphéðinn in relation to the feud.

Lýsing

Í kaflanum lítur Miller á rökvísina að baki húskarlavíganna í gegnum jafnvægis módelið sem hann bjó til og kynnti upphaflega í Bloodtaking and Peacemaking. Hann heldur því fram að deiluferlið hafi átt að koma á jafnvægi milli deiluaðila, gjald fyrir áverka var hægt að borga bæði í peningum og blóði en hið síðarnefnda þótti traustari gjaldmiðill. Hann segir að jafnvægis kerfið hafi ekki verið fullkomið og gagnrýnt af höfundi Njálu þar sem hefndin fól í sér sigur yfir andstæðingum sínum frekar en að ná sáttum. Miller greinir einnig morð Skarphéðins á Sigmundi í samhengi deilna.

See also

References

Chapter 36: „Hvað fé er það, faðir?“: "But the cleverest and most devastating critique the author (of Njála) makes is one that reveals the conflicting incentives generated by paying compensation, rather than taking blood revenge instead. He severely undermines the idea that feud can be settled with money or property rather than blood. He shows that compensation, unless the specie is blood or exile, is at its core self-contradicting." (p. 79).

Chapter 37: Svo gættu þeir til á þeim misserum: "… actual Icelandic feuding and the model made it preferable for revenge to be served up cold; take your time and think. Only the stupid hit back right away, governed by anger; the wise avenger takes his time, as do Bergthora and Hallgerd, each cooly waiting a year." (p. 87).

Links

  • Written by: Yoav Tirosh
  • Icelandic translation: Andri M. Kristjánsson